Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 336 OF 2013

Case between M.T. Muhammed et al vs Meleveettil Abdul Basheer's Children regarding occupancy dispute

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2016-09-09
Duration
3 years 8 days
Case Closed
Fri, 09/09/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs seek mandatory injunction to vacate property and claim damages for use, rent arrears, and enhanced license fee.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted mandatory injunction to vacate the property, realized rent arrears, increased license fee with damages for use and occupation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory Injunction, Arrears of License Fee, Damages for Use and Occupation
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction, Realization of Damages
Final Judgment
No
The court granted mandatory injunction to vacate the property, realized rent arrears, increased license fee with damages for use and occupation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided evidence of the license agreement, ownership, arrears, and revoked permission for occupancy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs provided evidence of the license agreement, ownership, arrears, and revoked permission for occupancy.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendants remained ex parte, evidence adduced by PW1 remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. So, the plaintiffs have adduced cogent and reliable evidence to prove their case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- 1. The defendants are directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property within a period of 2 months from today. 2. The plaintiffs are entitled to realise Rs.1,66,920/- with interest 6% per annum as arrears of license fee. 3. The plaintiffs are entitled to realize damages for use and occupation @ Rs.15,000/- per month from the defendants from the date of suit till the defendants vacate the property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.T. Muhammed
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o. Madambath Thadathil Koya Haji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Salmanul Faris
Party Age
26
Relation
Child of M.T. Muhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Faisal
Party Age
23
Relation
Child of M.T. Muhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammad Shahir
Party Age
34
Relation
Not mentioned
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Gafoor
Party Age
35
Relation
Not mentioned
Plaintiffs Documents
License Agreement Ext.A1, Lawyer Notice Ext.A2, Acknowledgment Card Ext.A3, etc.
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants directed to vacate property within 2 months
Evidence:
The defendants are directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property within a period of 2 months from today.
Relief Type: Arrears of License Fee
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs entitled to realize Rs.1,66,920/- with interest of 6% per annum
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realise Rs.1,66,920/- with interest 6% per annum as arrears of license fee.
Relief Type: Damages for Use and Occupation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs entitled to realize damages @ Rs.15,000/- per month till vacation of property
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realize damages for use and occupation @ Rs.15,000/- per month from the defendants from the date of suit till the defendants vacate the property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed license agreement between first plaintiff and defendants
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued by plaintiffs directing defendants to vacate premises and pay damages
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card evidencing receipt of notice by first defendant
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction, Realization of Damages
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Property dispute
Case Code
Case between M.T. Muhammed et al vs Meleveettil Abdul Basheer's Children regarding occupancy dispute
Case Code Year
Case between M.T. Muhammed et al vs Meleveettil Abdul Basheer's Children regarding occupancy dispute

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 09/09/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 09/09/2016 - 12:00
From
Thu, 09/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Fri, 09/30/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Puliyakkathodi Koitha et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Property Delivery Plaintiff Won
Case between Pelayam Parmabil Hamza and Kunhikrishnan et al regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won
Case between Shakkeela vs Kavumpurath Muhammedali et al regarding property possession
Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunnathakath Kader Javid vs Kavumpuram Muhammed Shaji regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M.T. Muhammed et al vs P.V. Abdul Nazar regarding license agreement and occupation
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Damages Plaintiff Won