Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.322/2018

Case between M/S.P.T.C Builders et al vs John T. Varghese regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-10-17
Duration
approximately-7 years 5 months 19 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M/S.P.T.C Builders and its partners, are seeking to recover a sum of ₹8,74,418.83 from the defendant, John T. Varghese, for the sale of an apartment he agreed to purchase. The defendant has partially paid but has not completed the payment despite the plaintiffs fulfilling their obligations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and ordered the defendant to pay ₹8,74,418.83, along with interest and costs. The defendant was found liable for not completing the payment as stipulated in the purchase agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is awarded a decree for realisation of ₹8,74,418.83 with future interest of 12% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and ordered the defendant to pay ₹8,74,418.83, along with interest and costs. The defendant was found liable for not completing the payment as stipulated in the purchase agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant failed to make the balance payment as per the agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant failed to make the balance payment as per the agreement.
Supporting Evidence
Furthermore with respect to the contention that there is delay in issuance of occupancy certificate by the plaintiff it is seen that the plaintiff had filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court as WP(C). No.7236/2017 wherein the Hon’ble High Court has directed the Corporation to issue occupancy certificate to the apartments.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to a decree for realisation of Rs.8,74,418.83/- with future interest of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter with interest @ 6% per annum till its realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/S.P.T.C Builders
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Biju Jacob
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr.Nitin Jacob Biju
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
John T. Varghese
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil Agreement, The Statement of Account, The Certified Copy of Judgment, Partnership Deed, Registration Certificate
Defendants Documents
Nil Original Power of Attorney

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Ajakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ravindranathan.N.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Thejan Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Kokila Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to a decree for realisation of ₹8,74,418.83 with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled for realisation of ₹8,74,418.83/- from the defendant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum for the principal sum of ₹7,28,683/-.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement between the defendant and the first plaintiff firm for the sale of apartment No.7A.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement showing that an amount of ₹7,28,683 is due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2 series
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Judgment of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission regarding the defendant's complaint.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The deed confirming the partnership of the first plaintiff firm.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The registration certificate of the plaintiff firm.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original power of attorney
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The power of attorney authorizing the representative of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/S.P.T.C Builders et al vs John T. Varghese regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/S.P.T.C Builders et al vs John T. Varghese regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Registered Partnership Firm

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won