Case Summary
M/s.Indian Bank is the petitioner seeking to restore a previous case. Amal Digital Studio is the respondent and was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition submitted by M/s.Indian Bank for restoration of a previous case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner was granted another opportunity to proceed with the matter.
The petitioner was granted another opportunity to proceed with the matter.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner was granted another opportunity to proceed with the matter.
The petitioner was granted another opportunity to proceed with the matter.
Supporting Evidence
I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the matter.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition allowed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s.Indian Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Amal Digital Studio
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sowfiuar. I.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
To restore RP.296/24 on file.
Evidence:
one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the matter.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2025