Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No. 222/2025

Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs Thahakoya.A. regarding review of order

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
Case Code No.
222
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s.Canara Bank, represented by the Branch Manager, filed a petition to review a previous order regarding a case. The respondent, Thahakoya.A., did not file any objection.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to restore the original case RP. 125/25 was allowed by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
RP. 125/25 is restored on file
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to restore the original case RP. 125/25 was allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was filed in time and was in the interests of justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was filed in time and was in the interests of justice.
Supporting Evidence
The present petition is filed in time. Hence for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interests of justice the petition is allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interests of justice the petition is allowed. RP. 125/25 is restored on file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s.Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thahakoya.A.
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
I.Sowfiuar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed. RP. 125/25 is restored on file.
Evidence:
Hence for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interests of justice the petition is allowed. RP. 125/25 is restored on file.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s. Charms Beauty Parlour et al regarding setting aside an order.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Sajayan.M regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Babu Sathyanandam et al regarding restoration of RP.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Syam Krishnan.G., Gopalakrishnan regarding restoration of suit.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayachandran Nair @ Jayachandran vs M/s.Canara Bank regarding review of a previous petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won