Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit. No. 45/2024

Case between M/s. Union Bank of India vs Abdul Hayy regarding recovery of loan amount

Court
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Leena Rasheed
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 months
Case Closed
Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Union Bank of India filed a suit against Abdul Hayy for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount of Rs. 11,50,060. The defendant failed to repay the loan as agreed despite several demands from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 11,50,060 to the plaintiff along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 11,50,060/- along with interest and costs.
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 11,50,060 to the plaintiff along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved that the defendant availed the loan and defaulted in repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved that the defendant availed the loan and defaulted in repayment.
Supporting Evidence
Having gone through the documents marked and proof affidavit filed by the plaintiff, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has successfully proved that the defendant had availed loan from the plaintiff bank as stated in the plaint and since he defaulted in repayment as claimed in the plaint, the present suit has been filed and defendant is liable to pay the amount claimed in the plaint.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is hereby directed to pay an amount of 11,50,060/- (Rupees eleven lakh fifty thousand and sixty only) to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Union Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Hayy
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand Promissory note, Undertaking letter, Letter of Continuity, Agreement, Surrender Notice, Notice to defendant after seizure, Sale Notice, Non starter report, Certified copy of Accounts
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.S Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.R Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay an amount of 11,50,060/- to the plaintiff
Evidence:
The defendant is hereby directed to pay an amount of 11,50,060/- (Rupees eleven lakh fifty thousand and sixty only) to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the suit till realization
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the suit (13-09-2024) till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Undertaking Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Undertaking Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Surrender Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to the defendant regarding the vehicle
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Notice after seizure
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifying the defendant after vehicle seizure
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Sale Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent to the defendant regarding the sale of the vehicle
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Non Starter Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by DLSA
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Certified copy of accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the financial accounts from the relevant time
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Union Bank of India vs Abdul Hayy regarding recovery of loan amount
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Union Bank of India vs Abdul Hayy regarding recovery of loan amount

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 02/24/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Thanooja regarding realisation of amount
Commercial Court III Addl. Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Mr. Jagath K.M regarding realisation of money.
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal bank Ltd. vs MR. Jafer C. V regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ 1st ADDL.SUB JUDGE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Vijas K.P et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sreeraj.P regarding realisation of amount from the defendant.
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won