Case Summary
M/s UCO Bank filed a suit against Arshad M and others. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the court's decision to dismiss the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence on the date of the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and last time counsel submitted not pressing the memo.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s UCO Bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arshad M
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T P Abdulla
- Party Age
- 62
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shahidha
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Satheesh R Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pearson S Fernandez
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajan K Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s UCO Bank vs Arshad M et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s UCO Bank vs Arshad M et al regarding dismissal for default.