Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 187/2021

Case between M/s True wealth Hotels Pvt.Ltd., E.R. Govind, L. Balachandran vs M/s Cauvery Sons Company, P.V. Yagneswaran, Y.V. Rajesh regarding rent control petition.

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-11-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a rent control petition filed by M/s True Wealth Hotels Pvt. Ltd. against M/s Cauvery Sons Company and its representatives. The petitioner remained absent during several court postings, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence and lack of representation. The respondents confirmed that vacant possession of the property had already been surrendered.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner did not appear in court, leading to dismissal.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s True wealth Hotels Pvt.Ltd. (Age not specified years) M.G. Road, Pallimukku, Ernakulam, Kochi-682016 E.R. Govind (31 years years) 52, M.R. Square, D.H. Road, Kochi Pin-682016 L. Balachandran (65 years years) M.G. Road, Pallimukku, Ernakulam, Kochi-682016

Defendants

M/s Cauvery Sons Company (Age not specified years) XXXIX/4538, Padamadan Building, M.G. Road, Pallimukku, Ernakulam, Kochi-682016 P.V. Yagneswaran (60 years years) XXXIX/4538, Padamadan Building, M.G. Road, Pallimukku, Ernakulam, Kochi-682016 Y.V. Rajesh (35 years years) XXXIX/4538, Padamadan Building, M.G. Road, Pallimukku, Ernakulam, Kochi-682016

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Evidence:
The petitioner remained absent, though today posted for evidence of the petitioner. No proof affidavit also seen filed name called, no representation for petitioner. Petitioner continuously absent on last several postings also.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases