Case Summary
The plaintiffs, M/s True Wealth Hotels Pvt Ltd., filed a suit but were absent during the proceedings. The defendants were represented, leading to a dismissal of the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of representation during the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not appear in court to represent their case.
The plaintiffs did not appear in court to represent their case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not appear in court to represent their case.
The plaintiffs did not appear in court to represent their case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs were absent and not represented in open court.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s True Wealth Hotels Pvt Ltd.
- Relation
- represented by its Managing Director, Balachandran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Balachandran
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o Lekshmana
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Cauvery Sons Company
- Relation
- represented by its Proprietor, P.V.Yagneswaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.V.Yagneswaran
- Party Age
- 60
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Y.V.Rajesh
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o Yagneswaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Xavier Thomas A.T
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o A.K.Thomas
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sarojini V.N
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- D/o Narayanan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Latheesh Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Binitha James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.Rajagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Prabhu Murali Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Syam Sankar Panicker
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N.Retheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suma Retheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shanker Retheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bharath Senan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Midhun Raj P.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit dismissed for default
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s True Wealth Hotels Pvt Ltd. vs M/s Cauvery Sons Company regarding suit for default dismissal.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s True Wealth Hotels Pvt Ltd. vs M/s Cauvery Sons Company regarding suit for default dismissal.