Case Summary
The case involves M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries as the plaintiff and M/s S.J.Agencies as the defendant. The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of a proof affidavit.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, not represented. No proof affidavit seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s S.J.Agencies
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bharath Murali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.R.Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of proof affidavit.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s S.J.Agencies regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s S.J.Agencies regarding suit dismissal for default