Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 120/2023

Case between M/s Thoppil Fincorp vs P.J.Vincent et al regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Thoppil Fincorp, claims that the defendant, P.J.Vincent, failed to repay loans taken for various purposes, along with interest. The plaintiff seeks to recover the outstanding amount of Rs. 1,34,662/-.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay Rs. 1,34,662/- along with interest and costs. The defendants' claims against the validity of the loans were not substantiated.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay the plaintiff Rupees Rs. 1,34,662/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of the decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the existence of a valid loan agreement and the defendants' default in repayment.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows, 1)Defendants shall pay the plaintiff Rupees Rs. 1,34,662/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of the decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Thoppil Fincorp (Age not specified years) Thoppil towers, Kthrikadavu road, Kaloor, Kochi – 682 017 T.V.Thomas (62 years) Thoppil house, Kaloor, Kochi, Ernakulam District

Defendants

P.J.Vincent (Age not specified years) Palliparambil house, Vennala, Palarivattam P.O, Ernakulam – 682 025 Nitha Vincent (Age not specified years) Palliparambil house, Vennala, Palarivattam P.O, Ernakulam – 682 025

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 1,34,662/- along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows, 1) Defendants shall pay the plaintiff Rupees Rs. 1,34,662/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of the decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Therefore, the issue as to costs is found in favour of the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of the sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the 1st defendant's ownership which is relevant to the loan agreements.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of the tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the identification and verification of the 1st defendant's property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of the promissory note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the basis for the plaintiff's claim of the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms under which the loan was granted.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves to demonstrate that the defendants were notified about the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the failure of delivery to the second defendant, supporting the claim of notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a summary of the financial transactions related to the loan accounts.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/31/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases