Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 666/2024

Case between M/s Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Deepesh Kumar et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by T.V. Thomas, were absent in court, while the defendants were present. Consequently, the case was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was continuously absent and not represented in court, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent their case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is Dismissed for Default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Thoppil Fincorp (Age not specified years) Thoppil Towers, Kathrikadavu road, Kaloor, Kochi – 682 017 T.V.Thomas (63 years years) Thoppil house, Kaloor, Kochi, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Deepesh Kumar (43 years years) Sobhalayam, 34/548, near Ashoka world school, Elamakkara P.O, Ernakulam – 682 026 Neethu Shajan (37 years years) Sobhalayam, 34/548, near Ashoka world school, Elamakkara P.O, Ernakulam – 682 026 Thomas C.A (50 years years) Cheruparambu house, Elamakkara P.O, Ernakulam – 682 026

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is Dismissed for Default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases