Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.306/2021

Case between M/s. Thoppil Chits (P) Ltd. vs Beatrice.L et al regarding rejection of plaint.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-28
Duration
approximately-2 years 7 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Thoppil Chits (P) Ltd. filed a suit against Beatrice.L and B. Stalin regarding a civil matter. The case was heard with the presence of counsel on 28/02/2024.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee. Thus, the case could not proceed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not fulfill the court fee requirements.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Thoppil Chits (P) Ltd. (Age not specified years) Thoppil Towers, Kathrikadavu Road, Kaloor, Kochi, Pin-682 017

Defendants

Beatrice.L (Age not specified years) Charivupurayidom, Padappakara.P.O., Mulavana, Kollam, Pin–691 503 B. Stalin (Age not specified years) St. Antony’s Cottage, Kanjiracode, Kundara.P.O., Kollam, Pin–691 501

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Suit filed under Section 26 r/w Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure was rejected due to unpaid balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 07/28/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases