Case Summary
M/s. Thoppil Chits (P) Ltd. filed a suit against Beatrice.L and B. Stalin regarding a civil matter. The case was heard with the presence of counsel on 28/02/2024.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee. Thus, the case could not proceed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not fulfill the court fee requirements.
Plaintiff did not fulfill the court fee requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not fulfill the court fee requirements.
Plaintiff did not fulfill the court fee requirements.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not paid.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Thoppil Chits (P) Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beatrice.L
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- B. Stalin
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sheeba.C.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.S.M. Kabeer
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajesh.K. Raju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit filed under Section 26 r/w Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure was rejected due to unpaid balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Thoppil Chits (P) Ltd. vs Beatrice.L et al regarding rejection of plaint.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Thoppil Chits (P) Ltd. vs Beatrice.L et al regarding rejection of plaint.