O.S. No. 1648 of 2019

Case between M/s. Thakadiyel Marketing vs M/s. S.N Gas Stove Shop regarding rejected suit

Court

COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Rejani Thankappan

Order Date

2024-03-26

Duration

Case Closed

Tue, 03/26/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s. Thakadiyel Marketing as the plaintiff and M/s. S.N Gas Stove Shop as the defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the balance court fee.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required balance court fee, leading to rejection of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required balance court fee, leading to rejection of the suit.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance court fee not remitted.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is rejected. Pronounced by me, in the open court on this the 26th day of March, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M/s. Thakadiyel Marketing
Party Age: 63
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M/s. S.N Gas Stove Shop
Relation: Represented by

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sunny.P.Markose
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: C.P Johny
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Bijumon E.A.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit balance court fee.

Evidence:

Suit is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification