Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 622/2023

Case between M/S Sreeshylam Finance vs Valsa Sabu regarding review of order lifting property attachment.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
Case Code No.
622
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/S Sreeshylam Finance filed a petition to review an order lifting the attachment over their property. The defendant in the case is Valsa Sabu.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the review petition filed by M/S Sreeshylam Finance.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the review petition filed by M/S Sreeshylam Finance.
Key Reasoning:
There is no error apparent on the face of the record.
Why Defendant Won:
There is no error apparent on the face of the record.
Supporting Evidence
This petition is filed to review the order dated 11.04.2025 lifting the attachment over the petition schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

As it appears that there is no error apparent on the face of the record, this petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/S Sreeshylam Finance
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsa Sabu
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajeev P Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun Sasi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anagha J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Denny Jose Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Raju Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The petition for review of the earlier order lifting the attachment over the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
As it appears that there is no error apparent on the face of the record, this petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won