Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 813/2023

Case between M/s. S.R Petrochemical vs M/s. Balaji & Co. regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-30
Duration
approximately-4 years 2 months
Case Closed
Tue, 07/30/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. S.R Petrochemical is suing M/s. Balaji & Co. for unpaid dues related to bulk bitumen supplied under credit terms. The defendant failed to pay the total outstanding amount despite multiple reminders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding amount of ₹6,20,463 along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay ₹6,20,463 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding amount of ₹6,20,463 along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided uncontested evidence proving the defendant's debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided uncontested evidence proving the defendant's debt.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 6,20,463/-(Rupees Six Lakh Twenty Thousand Four Hundred and Sixty-Three Only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or its assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. S.R Petrochemical
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Balaji & Co.
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of the bills with respect to the commodities purchased, True copy of the ledger account details, Copy of the lawyer notice, Postal Receipt, Postal Acknowledgment Card, Tax invoice No.ADZFS 5024 N
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bharath Murali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manu Nair G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff an amount of 6,20,463/- with interest.
Evidence:
I.The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 6,20,463/-(Rupees Six Lakh Twenty Thousand Four Hundred and Sixty-Three Only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or its assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: True copy of the bills with respect to the commodities purchased
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the commodities supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: True copy of the ledger account details
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides details of the financial transactions between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the formal demand made by the plaintiff to recover the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the dispatch of communication related to the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of receipt of the lawyer's notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document substantiates the transactions in question with specific invoicing details.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. S.R Petrochemical vs M/s. Balaji & Co. regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. S.R Petrochemical vs M/s. Balaji & Co. regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 05/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/30/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won