O.S. No. 1619/2015

Case between M/s SML Finance Ltd. vs Bindhu et al regarding non prosecution of the suit.

Court

THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Smt. Reeja R. Nair

Order Date

2026-01-05

Duration

Case Closed

Mon, 01/05/2026 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s SML Finance Ltd. filed a suit against Bindhu and others regarding a financial matter. The plaintiff remained absent during the hearings, leading to the dismissal of the case for non prosecution.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not file any necessary documentation.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not file any necessary documentation.

Supporting Evidence

No proof affidavit seen filed. No application also seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Thus, the suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M/s SML Finance Ltd.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Bindhu
Party Age: 42
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ruban
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mary
Party Age: 40
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: B.S. Suresh Kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sajan Puthenveettil
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.G. Cleetus
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Evidence: