Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 792/2022

Case between M/s. Skylink International vs Smitha Lakshmi regarding suit rejection.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s. Skylink International as the plaintiff and Smitha Lakshmi as the defendant. The suit was rejected due to no representation from the plaintiff and unpaid court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of representation and unpaid balance court fee. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of representation and unpaid balance court fee. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not pay the required court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not pay the required court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff no representation. Balance Court Fee not paid and no representation for plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 13th day of December, 2024).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baiju Y.P
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smitha Lakshmi
Party Age
31
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Abhilash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renuka Venu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aruna. A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Maithreyi S. Hegde
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anjali Anil. A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit was rejected due to non-representation by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid and no representation for plaintiff. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Skylink International vs Smitha Lakshmi regarding suit rejection.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Skylink International vs Smitha Lakshmi regarding suit rejection.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won