Case Summary
The case involves M/s. Skylink International as the plaintiff and Dixon Babu along with other defendants. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance court fee as directed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff did not pay the required balance court fee despite being directed to do so.
Key Reasoning:
The rejection of the plaint was due to the plaintiff's non-compliance with the court's order regarding court fees.
The rejection of the plaint was due to the plaintiff's non-compliance with the court's order regarding court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The rejection of the plaint was due to the plaintiff's non-compliance with the court's order regarding court fees.
The rejection of the plaint was due to the plaintiff's non-compliance with the court's order regarding court fees.
Supporting Evidence
No balance court fee seen remitted by plaintiff inspite of direction to remit within 15 days on 11.09.2025.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Skylink International
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dixon Babu
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vipin Venugopal
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Akshay Raveendran
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
No specific documents mentioned.
Defendants Documents
No specific documents mentioned.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S. Abhilash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Renuka Venu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anjana Kammath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.N. Manmadan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Prabhu Murali Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ralitzine Mendez
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Asher Revi Job
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Skylink International vs Dixon Babu et al regarding non-payment of court fees
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Skylink International vs Dixon Babu et al regarding non-payment of court fees