Case Summary
The case involves M/s Skyline Systems & Services claiming a recovery of Rs. 65,515/- from Jaison A A due to a payment discrepancy that arose from a typographical error. The plaintiff requested to amend the plaint and present additional evidence to clarify the amount recoverable.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions filed by the plaintiff to recall a witness and accept additional evidence were dismissed. The court found that the request did not merit reopening the evidence at the current stage of the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the petitions were aimed at prolonging the proceedings without merit.
The court determined that the petitions were aimed at prolonging the proceedings without merit.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the petitions were aimed at prolonging the proceedings without merit.
The court determined that the petitions were aimed at prolonging the proceedings without merit.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the present petition is only filed with an intention to protract the proceedings and without any merits.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, Petitions are dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Skyline Systems & Services
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joseph Philip
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leya Susan Varghese
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jaison A A
Plaintiffs Documents
Proof affidavit, various documents marked as Ext.A1, A3, A4, and A5.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S Sudhish Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sibi Karun
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajay N S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Baby Kuttan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Varghesekutty
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Additional Documents
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked subject to proof and can be adduced subsequently without recalling the PW1 as the evidence of plaintiff is not closed.
Reference:
Ext.A1, A3, A4, A5
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Testimony related to the evidence of the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Skyline Systems & Services vs Jaison A A regarding recovery of Rs. 65,515/-
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Skyline Systems & Services vs Jaison A A regarding recovery of Rs. 65,515/-