Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 464 /20 21

Case between M/s Skyline Systems & Services vs Jaison A A regarding recovery of Rs. 65,515/-

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
approximately-4 years 1 month 3 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s Skyline Systems & Services claiming a recovery of Rs. 65,515/- from Jaison A A due to a payment discrepancy that arose from a typographical error. The plaintiff requested to amend the plaint and present additional evidence to clarify the amount recoverable.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitions filed by the plaintiff to recall a witness and accept additional evidence were dismissed. The court found that the request did not merit reopening the evidence at the current stage of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the petitions were aimed at prolonging the proceedings without merit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petitions are dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Joseph Philip (64 years) Manayath, Recca Enclave, Padamugal, Kakkanad-682030 Leya Susan Varghese (42 years) Flat No. 5A, Silver Oak Skyline City Park, Jawahar Nagar, Kadavanthara P O – 682020

Defendants

Jaison A A (Age not specified years) Maxwin Aluminium Fabrication and Interior Work, Anjattuparambu House, Pattanam P O, Paravur, Pincode-683522

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Additional Documents
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked subject to proof and can be adduced subsequently without recalling the PW1 as the evidence of plaintiff is not closed.
Reference:
Ext.A1, A3, A4, A5
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Testimony related to the evidence of the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Tue, 05/18/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases