Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 588 /2011

Case between M/s Skyline Builders vs Peter et al regarding compromise settlement.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-04-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Skyline Builders filed a suit against Peter and others regarding a dispute, which has been resolved through a joint compromise petition. The court found the terms lawful and recorded the compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was resolved through a joint compromise between the parties, which the court decreed as lawful and accordingly recorded. The court granted a refund of court fees as per the applicable act.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee as per Section 69 of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the terms of the compromise lawful and satisfactory to all parties involved.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of compromise. Counter claim is decreed as per terms of agreement.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Skyline Builders (Age not specified years) CC. 41/349 B, Rajaji Road, Ernakulam

Defendants

Peter (87 years) Kurisingal House, Rameswaram Village, Palluruthy Vadakkumuri, Palluruthy P O, Pin: 682006 Peter Antony (55 years) 2B, Express Estate, Behind A J Hall, Kaloor – Kadavanthara Road, Kaloor- 682017 Joseph Xavier (60 years) Kurisinkal House, House No. CC 13/2604 (Old No. 23/1193), Palluruthy Vadakkum muriyil, Palluruthy P O, Pin- 682006 George Peter (53 years) Kurisinkal House, House No. CC 13/2604 (Old No: 23/1193), Palluruthy Vadakkum muriyil, Palluruthy P O, Pin- 682006 Teresa Augustine (61 years) New no:7, (Old No:16) Leith Castle South Street, Santhome, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai- 600028, Tamil Nadu

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of compromise.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Counter claim is decreed as per terms of agreement.
Evidence:
Counter claim is decreed as per terms of agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Parties are entitled to refund of court fee as per Section 69 of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Evidence:
Parties are entitled to refund of court fee as per Section 69 of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2011 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases