Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
EXECUTION PETITION NO. 335 OF 2019

Case between M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., Branch Office vs Vijayan V.V. et al regarding Execution of Arbitration Award

Court
MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-12-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the enforcement of an Arbitration Award by the petitioner against the judgment debtors. The court ruled that the Munsiff Court did not have jurisdiction for the execution.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The petition for execution was returned to be filed before the proper court due to lack of jurisdiction.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., Branch Office (59 years) KMS Tower, Thazhepalam, Tirur

Defendants

Vijayan V.V. (42 years) Vattam Valappil (H) Kaloor, Puthupalli PO., Purathur amsom, Puthuppalli desom, Tirur Taluk, 676 102 Mohanan K.P. (40 years) Kuttiparambil House, Purathur Munambu, Purathur amsom, desom and post, Tirur Taluk, 676 102

Reliefs

Relief Type: Execution of Arbitration Award
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Enforcement of Arbitration Award dated 30-03-2019
Evidence:
Court directed the petition to be filed before proper court

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Arbitration Award
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document on which execution petition is based
Reference:
Document Type: Decision in Sundaram Finance Ltd. V. Abdul Samad and Another (AIR 2018 SC 965)
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Referred by petitioner's counsel
Reference:
Document Type: Decision in Bhoomatha Para Boiled Rice (M/s.) and Oil Mill V. M/s. Maheshari Trading Company and Others (AIR 2010 AP 137)
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Referred by petitioner's counsel
Reference:
Document Type: Decision in Mahesh B. Shah V. Joseph, (2005 (3) KLT 787)
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Interpretation of 'court' under Section 36
Reference:
Document Type: Decision in ICDS Ltd. V. Mangala Builders Pvt. Ltd., (AIR 2001 Kar. 364)
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Interpretation of competent court to execute arbitral award
Reference:
Document Type: Decision in Metro Silks and Sarees V. Darpan Traders (2009 (3) KLT 916)
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Interpretation of competent court to execute arbitral award
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases