Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.659/2020

Case between M/s. Sha Enterprises vs M/s. Raj Electricals & Engineering Industries regarding compromise terms

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves M/s. Sha Enterprises and M/s. Raj Electricals & Engineering Industries. The parties entered into a compromise, which was accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was settled through a compromise. The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise accepted by both parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was settled through a compromise. The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise accepted by both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful and accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful and accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
Parties are entered into compromise voluntarily and the terms are found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise terms shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Sha Enterprises
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.M.Nadhirsha
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s.Raj Electricals & Engineering Industries
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Rajan
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.M.Mohamed Ayub
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.V.Shamsuddin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.R. Vinodkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Compromise terms are accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Sha Enterprises vs M/s. Raj Electricals & Engineering Industries regarding compromise terms
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Sha Enterprises vs M/s. Raj Electricals & Engineering Industries regarding compromise terms

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won