Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 668/2023

Case between M/s Scaffs Steel Structures Pvt. Ltd. vs Vipinlal regarding recovery of money

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-04-12
Duration
approximately-9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Scaffs Steel Structures Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director Mr. Razeem Usman, is suing Vipinlal, the proprietor of M/s Pinaka Trade Ventures, for failing to supply materials required for a project and for the dishonor of a cheque. The plaintiff demands repayment of the amount collected by the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff Rs. 5,55,099 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit until the date of decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay an amount of Rs.5,55,099 with 9% future interest per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaintiff's claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.5,55,099 with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit (ie, from 04.07.2023) till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Scaffs Steel Structures Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 88, 9th floor, Abad Nuclues Mall and Office Arcade, Maradu

Defendants

Vipinlal (Age not specified years) Proprietor M/s Pinaka Trade Ventures, Thrissur Road, Pazhayannur P.O, Thrissur, Kerala – 680 587

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.5,55,099/- with 9% future interest per annum.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.5,55,099/-(Rupees five lakhs fifty five thousand and ninety nine only) with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit (ie, from 04.07.2023) till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Quotation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the quotation issued by respondent no. PTV/004.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Transfer
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the acknowledgment of the transfer of Rs.2,00,000/- to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Performa Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of Performa Invoice issued by respondent no. 001.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Transfer
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the acknowledgment of the transfer of Rs. 2,31,332/-.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Cheque Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of cheque dishonour memo.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the cheque no. 830014.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Proof of Delivery
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the proof of delivery of lawyer’s notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the bank statement of the complainant for the period of 01.04.21 – 31.03.22.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Resolution.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Testimony of the plaintiff, who is examined as PW1.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 07/04/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases