Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 282/2017

Case between M/s Purvankara Limited vs Purva Grandbay Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding withdrawal of the suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-09-24
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 09/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Purvankara Limited filed a suit against Purva Grandbay Apartment Owner’s Association and others. The plaintiff requested to withdraw the suit, which led to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed as withdrawn in the presence of both parties. No costs were ordered.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed as withdrawn in the presence of both parties. No costs were ordered.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff voluntarily withdrew the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff voluntarily withdrew the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted the plaintiff's withdrawal memo.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Purvankara Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Purva Grandbay Apartment Owner’s Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S Narayana Moorthy
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nirmala Aryan
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Ramesh Kumar
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renolze Rahman
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jolly John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Liza Meghan Cyriac
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jerie Ramesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anupama Sibi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunil N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Janaki Devi S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kabil Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anuja P Anto
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed withdrawal memo. Hence suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Purvankara Limited vs Purva Grandbay Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding withdrawal of the suit
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Purvankara Limited vs Purva Grandbay Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding withdrawal of the suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 09/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won