Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 993/2023

Case between M/s Punjab National Bank vs Ann Jose regarding Suit for money.

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
approximately-8 years 2 months
Case Closed
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s Punjab National Bank, a nationalized banking institution, suing Ann Jose, a proprietrix of a business, for defaulting on loan repayments. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to repay loans amounting to ₹3,78,412.92.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay total dues of ₹3,78,412.92 along with interest at the rate of 10.70% per annum. The plaintiff is also entitled to litigation costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹2,66,132.52 for the term loan and ₹1,12,280.42 for the cash credit, along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay total dues of ₹3,78,412.92 along with interest at the rate of 10.70% per annum. The plaintiff is also entitled to litigation costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the documents and evidence presented substantiated the plaintiff's claims regarding the loans and the defendant's repayment defaults.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the documents and evidence presented substantiated the plaintiff's claims regarding the loans and the defendant's repayment defaults.
Supporting Evidence
The defendant herself has not rendered any oral evidence in this case. From the side of the defendant, Mr. Jose Francis, who is stated to be the CEO of the proprietary firm M/s Engineering Designs and Structural Stabilizations, has not raised any objection as to the correctness or veracity of the account statements produced...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. The defendant is directed to pay 2,66,132.52/- to the plaintiff along with interest @10.70% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of realization. The defendant is also directed to pay 1,12,280.42/- to the plaintiff along with interest @10.70% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of realization. Plaintiff shall also be entitled for costs of the litigation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Punjab National Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ann Jose
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Sole proprietorship letter, Original Sanction letter, Original of Term Loan agreement, Original of Agreement of Hypothecation of Assets, Original of Balance and Security Confirmation in the Term loan Account bearing A/c no. 11417015003367, Original of Balance and Security Confirmation in the cash credit Account bearing A/c no. 11414025003374, True extract of Loan Account in Term Loan bearing A/c no. 11417015003367, True extract of loan Account cash credit bearing A/c no. 11414025003367, Statement of account bearing A/c no. 11417015003367 issued by Punjab National Bank for the period from 30.08.17 to 30.09.23, Statement of account bearing A/c no. 11414025003374 issued by Punjab National Bank for the period from 24.08.17 to 30.09.23
Defendants Documents
True copy of the reply of the Ombudsman, True copy of the representation sent to the State level Bankers Committee (SLBC), Certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saji P Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.C.Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mini G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Seena A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thankarajan P.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sali P Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreeraj K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Gayathri A.L
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ramkumar J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay the outstanding amount with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay 2,66,132.52/- to the plaintiff along with interest @10.70% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay the outstanding amount with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is also directed to pay 1,12,280.42/- to the plaintiff along with interest @10.70% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of realisation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled for costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
I find no result to deviate from the normal rule that costs shall follow the event.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sole Proprietorship Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original document confirming the proprietary status of the defendant's business.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original document detailing the sanctioned term loan to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Term loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original agreement outlining the terms of the term loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement of Hypothecation of Assets
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original document outlining the hypothecation of assets for the cash credit facility.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation in the Term Loan Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original confirmation acknowledging the liability in the term loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation in the Cash Credit Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original confirmation acknowledging the liability in the cash credit account.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: True extract of Loan account in term Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Extract of the loan account details for the term loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: True Extract of Loan Account in Cash Credit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Extract of the loan account details for the cash credit facility.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account for the term loan issued by the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account for the cash credit loan issued by the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Reply of the Ombudsman
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
True copy of the response regarding complaints raised by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Representation to SLBC
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
True copy of the representation made regarding the banking issues.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified document used to establish the admissibility of electronic records.
Reference:
Ext.B3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s Punjab National Bank vs Ann Jose regarding Suit for money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Punjab National Bank vs Ann Jose regarding Suit for money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 08/23/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won