Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 182 of 2020

Case between M/s. Prabhath Marketing & Trading Company vs M/s. National Agencies regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-02-28
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Prabhath Marketing & Trading Company, is suing the defendant, M/s. National Agencies, for the recovery of an amount due from a dishonored cheque. The plaintiff claims that the defendant owes Rs.43,290 with interest after the cheque issued was returned due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was allowed to recover Rs.43,290 along with interest from the defendants. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of Rs. 43,290 with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was allowed to recover Rs.43,290 along with interest from the defendants. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the cheque was issued in discharge of a debt, which was not disproven by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the cheque was issued in discharge of a debt, which was not disproven by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The issuance of Ext.A1 cheque leaf is admitted by DW1 and had not adduced any evidence to show that it was not issued in discharge of a debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs. 43,290 (Rupees Forty Three thousand Two hundred and Ninety only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till entire realization in full from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Prabhath Marketing & Trading Company
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. National Agencies
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Rameez
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original cheque for Rs. 43,290 bearing No. 009006, True copy of the lawyer notice, Postal acknowledgment cards, True copy of invoice No. 616, True copy of the ledger account details, Authorization letter.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.A Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aneesh K.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs. 43,290 along with interest from the defendants
Evidence:
The plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs. 43,290 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till entire realization in full from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff company is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants
Evidence:
The plaintiff company is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original cheque for Rs. 43,290 bearing No. 009006 issued in discharge of liability
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendant demanding the amount covered by the cheque
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal acknowledgment cards confirming receipt of the lawyer notice
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of invoice No. 616 related to the supply of goods
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the ledger account details related to transactions with the defendant
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorization letter validating the representation of the plaintiff by the manager
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Prabhath Marketing & Trading Company vs M/s. National Agencies regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Prabhath Marketing & Trading Company vs M/s. National Agencies regarding realisation of money.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 02/28/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won