Case Summary
The case involves M/s. Ponnore Enterprises LLP as the plaintiff seeking an injunction against Harisun Industries and Haris Abdul, the defendants. The suit was brought under the Civil Procedure Code.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to balance court fee not being remitted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under the Civil Procedure Code due to non-remittance of the court fee.
The plaint was rejected under the Civil Procedure Code due to non-remittance of the court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected under the Civil Procedure Code due to non-remittance of the court fee.
The plaint was rejected under the Civil Procedure Code due to non-remittance of the court fee.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not remitted till date.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule11(c) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Ponnore Enterprises LLP
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Harisun Industries
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Haris Abdul
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N. Muhammed Nahas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Vimal Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit filed by the plaintiff for injunction.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule11(c) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Ponnore Enterprises LLP vs Harisun Industries et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Ponnore Enterprises LLP vs Harisun Industries et al regarding injunction