Case Summary
The plaintiff, M/s. Paradigm IT Pvt.Ltd, filed a suit against the defendant, Avanthika, for recovery of damages and training costs after the defendant absconded from her job. The court found the defendant liable for breaching her employment agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs.2,00,793 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.2,00,793 with interest and costs from the defendant. The defendant was found liable for breaching the employment agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant's unauthorized absence amounted to material breach of contract.
The defendant's unauthorized absence amounted to material breach of contract.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant's unauthorized absence amounted to material breach of contract.
The defendant's unauthorized absence amounted to material breach of contract.
Supporting Evidence
This court found that the defendant is liable to pay Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one lakh only) with interest for damages and loss incurred by the plaintiff company.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs.2,00,793 (Rupees Two lakhs Seven hundred and Ninety Three only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Paradigm IT Pvt.Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Avanthika
- Party Age
- 21
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Board of Resolution dated 09.06.2021, true copy of the appointment letter dated 17.09.2020, office copy of the employment agreement dated 28.09.2020.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese.K.Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Benny.M.John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aginov Mathappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sherin Mohan.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs.2,00,793 from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs.2,00,793 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum.
Relief Type:
Cost
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff company is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff company is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Board of Resolution
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document authorized PW1 to conduct the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Appointment Letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the terms of employment of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Employment Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contains the terms and conditions of the defendant's employment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Software Training Schedule
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves that the defendant underwent software training.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Timesheet
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the training period of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a demand notice for damages and training cost from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the defendant's response to the demand notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Paradigm IT Pvt.Ltd vs Avanthika regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Paradigm IT Pvt.Ltd vs Avanthika regarding realization of money.