Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 573 of 2021

Case between M/s. Paradigm IT Pvt.Ltd vs Avanthika regarding realization of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-01-19
Duration
approximately-3 years 3 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Paradigm IT Pvt.Ltd, filed a suit against the defendant, Avanthika, for recovery of damages and training costs after the defendant absconded from her job. The court found the defendant liable for breaching her employment agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.2,00,793 with interest and costs from the defendant. The defendant was found liable for breaching the employment agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs.2,00,793 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant's unauthorized absence amounted to material breach of contract.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs.2,00,793 (Rupees Two lakhs Seven hundred and Ninety Three only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Paradigm IT Pvt.Ltd (Age not specified years) 28/2373C, Chilavanoor Road, Elamkulam, Kochi 682020, Kerala, India

Defendants

Avanthika (21 years) Ram Nivas House, Mokeri (PO), Kannur, Pin 670692.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs.2,00,793 from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs.2,00,793 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff company is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff company is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Board of Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document authorized PW1 to conduct the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Appointment Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the terms of employment of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Employment Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contains the terms and conditions of the defendant's employment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Software Training Schedule
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves that the defendant underwent software training.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Timesheet
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the training period of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a demand notice for damages and training cost from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the defendant's response to the demand notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala, India
Case Filed
Wed, 06/09/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases