Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 56/2021

Case between M/s. Organic Brand Promotion Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Rajesh Manchanda regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-04
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Organic Brand Promotion Services Pvt. Ltd. is suing Rajesh Manchanda for outstanding payments related to advertisements. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has failed to pay the balance amount due despite repeated requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the amount claimed along with interest. The defendant was found liable for the payments due.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 98,597 from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest per annum till the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established the case through unchallenged evidence and documentation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 98,597 from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest per annum till the date of realization from defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Organic Brand Promotion Services Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 44/21, D2­ North Avenue Apartments, Lissie Junction, Kochi­682018 Dileep Narayanan (45 years)

Defendants

Rajesh Manchanda (47 years) 40/7100, M.G. Road, Padma Junction, Kochi­35

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 98,597 from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 98,597 (Rupees Ninety Eight Thousand Five Hundred and Ninety Seven) from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest per annum till the date of realization from defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: GST Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoices issued by the plaintiff to the defendant for advertisement charges.
Reference:
Ext.A1, A1(a), A1(b)
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendant seeking payment of the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card evidencing receipt of the lawyer notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ledger account from the plaintiff company for the period from 01.04.2016 to 31.03.2017.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ledger account for the defendant maintained by the plaintiff for the period from 01.04.2017 to 31.03.2018.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ledger account for the defendant maintained by the plaintiff for the period from 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2019.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ledger account for the defendant maintained by the plaintiff for the period from 01.04.2019 to 31.03.2020.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ledger account for the defendant maintained by the plaintiff for the period from 01.04.2020 to 05.01.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Unchallenged oral testimony of the Managing Director of the plaintiff company.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/05/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases