Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 684/2021

Case between M/s. Organic Brand Promotion Services Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s. Dream Flower Housing Projects Pvt. Ltd. regarding declaration and consequential reliefs.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-09-09
Duration
approximately-4 years 3 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Organic Brand Promotion Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against M/s. Dream Flower Housing Projects Pvt. Ltd. for recovery of due payments related to branding services. The plaintiff claims an outstanding amount of Rs.2,54,012/- from the defendant but the defendant disputes the claims stating all amounts were settled.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff allowing recovery of Rs.1,78,737/- from the defendant with interest. It found that the plaintiff proved its claims of outstanding payments against the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs.1,78,737/- from the defendant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its case beyond the preponderance of probabilities, showing that the defendant legally owes the claimed amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs.1,78,737/- from the defendant and his assets with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Organic Brand Promotion Services Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 44/21, D2 - North Avenue Apartments, Lissie Jn., Kochi-682 018 Dileep Narayanan (45 years)

Defendants

M/s. Dream Flower Housing Projects Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 49/1295E, Dreamflower Chuttupadukara Ponekkara Road, Edappally P. O. Kochi, PIN-682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover an amount of Rs.1,78,737/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the light of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is evident that it was for the defendant to disprove the case of the plaintiff, since the plaintiff has proved his case beyond the preponderance of probabilities.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Interest is allowed at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
The claim of the plaintiff seeking interest for 36% pa is on a higher side and hence cannot be allowed. Interest at the rate of 12% deems reasonable in this case.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows; ii. The plaintiff is also allowed to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: GST Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This invoice was issued for retainership fees.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: GST Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This invoice was issued for retainership fees.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: GST Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This invoice was issued for retainership fees.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant for payment of dues.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card serves as proof of communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This ledger shows details of the financial transactions between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This ledger shows details of the financial transactions between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Email Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This email places a request for advertising services.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Email Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This email is a communication between the plaintiff and defendant regarding their business.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This notice is a communication from the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Email Communication
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This is an email communication pertinent to the case.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Acknowledgment Ledger
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This ledger shows the settlement of bills by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Acknowledgment Ledger
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This ledger shows the settlement of bills by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Covering Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This letter is a covering document related to payment settlements.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Covering Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This letter is another covering document related to payment settlements.
Reference:
Ext.B6

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases