O.S. No. 437/2025

Case between M/s Olive Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Ancy S regarding dismissal for default

Court

Munsiff Court, Ernakulam

Judge

Nanda Krishna M

Order Date

2025-11-05

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Olive Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Olive Kalista Owner's Association are the plaintiffs in this case. The defendant, Ancy S, was present, but the plaintiffs were absent and did not represent themselves in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs despite multiple opportunities for representation.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs despite multiple opportunities for representation.

Key Reasoning:

Why Defendant Won:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M/s Olive Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Olive Kalista Owner's Association
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ancy S
Party Age: 29
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: M Jayakrishnan Vazhoor
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sreejith V
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Vidya Kuriakose
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Navaneeth D Pai
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K Krishna Prasad
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Soumya Francis
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Dismissal of the suit for default due to plaintiff's absence.

Evidence: