Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.408/2021

Case between M/s. Norden Communication Private Limited vs M/s. R.K.tech (India) Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Norden Communication Private Limited filed a suit against M/s. R.K.tech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director S. Rajkumar. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court delivered a judgment rejecting the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court delivered a judgment rejecting the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not comply with court fee requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not comply with court fee requirements.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance Court Fee not paid.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Norden Communication Private Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. R.K.tech (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S. Rajkumar
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh Vijayendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.T. Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Priyanka Gopi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lakshmi Narayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaintiff rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Norden Communication Private Limited vs M/s. R.K.tech (India) Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Norden Communication Private Limited vs M/s. R.K.tech (India) Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won