Case Summary
The case involves M/s Mulanthuruthy Service Co- operative Bank Ltd. No. 23 as the petitioner and Sri. Mathew Thomas as the respondent, focusing on the execution petition. The decree holder was absent during the hearings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition due to the absence of the decree holder without representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
This petition has come up for hearing before me on 13.12.2024 and the court on the same day passed the following: Decree Holder absent. No representation. Taken up again at 1.30 PM. No representation and no steps taken. Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Mulanthuruthy Service Co- operative Bank Ltd. No. 23
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sri. Mathew Thomas
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mathew Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- O. V Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.P. B. Subramanian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rema Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Mulanthuruthy Service Co- operative Bank Ltd. No. 23 vs Sri. Mathew Thomas regarding E.P No. 63/2024
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Mulanthuruthy Service Co- operative Bank Ltd. No. 23 vs Sri. Mathew Thomas regarding E.P No. 63/2024