Case Summary
The plaintiff, M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd., represented by Vineeth. V.S., pursued a suit against defendant Fathahudheen and his spouse Shajeela. The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and no balance court fee remitted.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Plaint Rejected U/O7 Rule11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathahudheen
- Party Age
- 53
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajeela
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Suhas Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's case was rejected due to absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. No Balance Court Fee remitted . Hence Plaint Rejected U/O7 Rule11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Fathahudheen et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Fathahudheen et al regarding rejection of plaint