Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.1202/23 IN OS.No.1162/2018

Case between M/s. Mega Exporters Ltd et al vs M/s. Radha Agencies Kovalam et al regarding ex-parte decree setting aside

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-7 years 3 months 14 days
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s. Mega Exporters Ltd and related plaintiffs against M/s. Radha Agencies and related defendants regarding a petition to set aside an ex-parte decree. The defendants claim they were not properly represented due to health issues and the winding-up of their firm.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition to set aside an ex-parte decree stating that the delay application was already dismissed, rendering this petition not maintainable.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition to set aside an ex-parte decree stating that the delay application was already dismissed, rendering this petition not maintainable.
Key Reasoning:
The delay application was dismissed, making the petition to set aside the ex-parte order inapplicable.
Why Defendant Won:
The delay application was dismissed, making the petition to set aside the ex-parte order inapplicable.
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that the delay application was dismissed, hence the petition does not arise for consideration.

Judgment Evidence:

Since the application to condone the delay stands dismissed, this petition does not arise for consideration. Accordingly, this petition also stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Mega Exporters Ltd
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Parijathan.M
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajitha
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Radha Agencies Kovalam
Relation
represented by its proprietrix
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Pankajakshan
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Praveen Pankajakshan
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Priya Radha
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prabha.R
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A. Vahab
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Aswakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioners requested to set aside an ex-parte decree.
Evidence:
Since the application to condone the delay stands dismissed, this petition does not arise for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referred to these invoices which were produced by the respondent as evidence of transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to Ext.A9
Document Type: Court Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The order details the proceedings and decisions made in the case.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Mega Exporters Ltd et al vs M/s. Radha Agencies Kovalam et al regarding ex-parte decree setting aside
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Mega Exporters Ltd et al vs M/s. Radha Agencies Kovalam et al regarding ex-parte decree setting aside

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 07/16/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won