Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.364/2024

Case between M/s. Max India Integrated Foundation vs Sabu.S.S et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt. Salini.B
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Max India Integrated Foundation, sanctioned a loan to the first defendant for business purposes under the guarantee of the second defendant. The defendants breached the agreement by failing to repay the loan despite multiple requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs. 1,40,891/- along with interest. The plaintiff's evidence proved its case effectively.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. 1,40,891/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 17% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs. 1,40,891/- along with interest. The plaintiff's evidence proved its case effectively.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case and entitled it to a decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case and entitled it to a decree.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence prove its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. 1,40,891/- (Rupees One lakh Forty thousand Eight hundred and Ninety One only) to the plaintiff jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 17% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Max India Integrated Foundation
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabu.S.S
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu .S.S
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Promissory Notice dated 13.01.2023, Agreement with application form dated 12.01.2023, Certified copy of statement of accounts, Copy of lawyer’s notice dated 21.07.2023, Copy of notarized power of attorney dated 29.01.2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Madhukumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Molamma Manuel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajan .S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Varun Prathap. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anjali. P.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff requested to recover an amount of Rs. 1,40,891/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is decreed with costs and defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. 1,40,891/- (Rupees One lakh Forty thousand Eight hundred and Ninety One only) to the plaintiff jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 17% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original promissory notice executed by the 1st defendant agreeing to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement with Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement related to the loan sanctioned to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of statement of accounts reflecting the loan details.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of notice sent by the plaintiff's lawyer for non-repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Notarized Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of power of attorney authorizing the representative of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Max India Integrated Foundation vs Sabu.S.S et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Max India Integrated Foundation vs Sabu.S.S et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/13/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won