Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 737/2025

Case between M/s M Acoustics et al vs Bismi Rajesh et al regarding interim mandatory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-09-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M/s M Acoustics and others, seek an interim mandatory injunction against the defendants for unlawfully locking them out of the premises they rented for business. The plaintiffs claim they have been wrongfully denied access to their property and seek court intervention to retrieve the keys and resume operations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found merit in the plaintiffs' claims and granted their request for an interim mandatory injunction. The defendants are ordered to return the keys to the plaintiffs within a week to allow them to resume their business operations.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim mandatory injunction to hand over the keys of the petition schedule building
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the plaintiffs maintained a lawful tenancy and the taking of keys could lead to unlawful eviction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is allowed. Respondents are directed by an interim mandatory injunction to hand over the keys of the petition schedule building to the petitioners within one week.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s M Acoustics (42 years) Illiparambil House, Arattuthara P O, Now residing at 1005, Confident Auriga III, Pookkattupadi, Edathala, Pin – 683 561 M/s Melbourne Pro Av Tech (42 years) Illiparambil House, Arattuthara P O, Now residing at 1005, Confident Auriga III, Pookkattupadi, Edathala, Pin – 683 561 M/s Melbourne Media Factory (42 years) Illiparambil House, Arattuthara P O, Now residing at 1005, Confident Auriga III, Pookkattupadi, Edathala, Pin – 683 561 Anson I J (42 years) Illiparambil House, Arattuthara P O, Now residing at 1005, Confident Auriga III, Pookkattupadi, Edathala, Pin – 683 561

Defendants

Bismi Rajesh (45 years) Bethel, 12/430-E GAIL, HMT Colony P O, Colony Road, Kalamassery, Pin- 683 503 Rajesh (48 years) Bethel, 12/430-E GAIL, HMT Colony P O, Colony road, Kalamassery, Pin- 683 503

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are directed by an interim mandatory injunction to hand over the keys of the petition schedule building to the petitioners within one week.
Evidence:
the petition is liable to be allowed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners are directed to pay the admitted rent from the month of July till date to the respondents without fail.
Evidence:
Petitioners shall remit the admitted rent each month thereafter on the date fixed as per the lease agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Payment Details
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the details regarding the rent paid to the defendants by the 1st plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rent Payment Details
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the details regarding the rent paid to the defendants by the 2nd plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Rent Payment Details
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the details regarding the rent paid to the defendants by the 3rd plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This lease agreement was signed by plaintiff No. 4 for Naath Consultancy.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This lease agreement was signed by plaintiff No. 4 for Global acoustics.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report outlines the findings from the commission regarding the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases