Case Summary
The petition is filed by M/s Leh Aesthetics Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. against R. Vijayakumar regarding the rent for a commercial building. The parties entered into a settlement during mediation, fixing the fair rent at Rs.12,500/-.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Fair rent fixed at Rs.12,500/- with effect from 01.10.2025.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition is allowed, and the respondent is directed to comply with the terms of the compromise. The rent is fixed at Rs.12,500/- effective from 01.10.2025.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation agreement was accepted as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
The mediation agreement was accepted as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation agreement was accepted as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
The mediation agreement was accepted as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
This court is satisfied under Section 5 of the Act, and accordingly a final order in terms of the compromise can be passed based on the admission of the parties.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under Section 5 of the Act as follows: 1) The respondent is hereby directed to comply the terms of compromise, failing which the petitioner is entitled to proceed against the respondent as per law.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Leh Aesthetics Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R. Vijayakumar
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of Agreement dated 10.09.2025, mediation report
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Peeyus A. Kottom
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Soniya M.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Haseena A.A.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Krishnakumar J. Adoor
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bincy P. Paul
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.G. Sunil
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is allowed and the fair rent of the building is fixed at Rs.12,500/- with effect from 01.10.2025.
Evidence:
Thus, this court is satisfied under Section 5 of the Act, and accordingly a final order in terms of the compromise can be passed based on the admission of the parties.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to comply with the terms of compromise.
Evidence:
The respondent is hereby directed to comply the terms of compromise, failing which the petitioner is entitled to proceed against the respondent as per law.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Leh Aesthetics Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs R. Vijayakumar regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Leh Aesthetics Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs R. Vijayakumar regarding Rent Control
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement