Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 459/2024

Case between M/s. Le Paradise Hospitality Pvt.Ltd. et al vs M/s. Harbour View Residency Pvt.Ltd. regarding plaint rejection.

Court
Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-01-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Le Paradise Hospitality Pvt.Ltd. and its managing partner C.P. Shoukathali are the plaintiffs. They filed a suit against M/s. Harbour View Residency Pvt.Ltd. which was dismissed due to non-compliance with a prior order.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to comply with an earlier order. Consequently, the plaint was rejected.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of Civil Procedure Code.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Le Paradise Hospitality Pvt.Ltd. (Age not specified years) Chittalikkal House, Kannoorkkara, Thana P.O., Kannur 670012 C.P. Shoukathali (65 years) Pallikkara House, Nere Juma Masjid, Cherukunnu, Kannur, Kerala 670 301

Defendants

M/s. Harbour View Residency Pvt.Ltd. (Age not specified years) Opposite Cochin Shipyard, M.G. Road, Ernakulam Village, Kanayanoor Taluk, Kochi 682 015 Ms. Rekha C. Babu (51 years) BCG Bunglow Annex, Ambedkar Road, Vennala P.O., Kochi 682 028

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of Civil Procedure Code.
Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases