Case Summary
The case involves a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction filed by M/S. Lady’s Fingers against M/S. Goldenarc Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. The plaintiff decided to withdraw the suit as the matter was settled between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn since the parties settled the matter and the plaintiff did not intend to proceed further.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the matter further. In the result suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/S. Lady’s Fingers
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/S. Goldenarc Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- John Joseph (Roy)
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sabir.N.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jomy George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Padmaraj
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Ajith Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sajeevan.V.T
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Chitra.N.Das
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rishab.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Ashok.V
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anjali.G.Kutty
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Malli Govindan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Suit is for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/S. Lady’s Fingers vs M/S. Goldenarc Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between M/S. Lady’s Fingers vs M/S. Goldenarc Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement