Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 187/2024

Case between M/s Kuzhippilly Traders vs M/s GTN Textiles Limited et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-07-08
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Kuzhippilly Traders filed a suit against M/s GTN Textiles Limited and other defendants. The plaintiff was continuously absent from the hearings, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court. As a result, the court dismissed the suit for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in a dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Kuzhippilly Traders (Age not specified years) KPVII/141, PP Road, Pattimattom, 683 562, Ernakulam, Kerala

Defendants

M/s GTN Textiles Limited (Age not specified years) 6th floor, 61/646, 6th floor, Palal Towers, Ravipuram, M.G. Road, Poonithura village, Kanayannur taluk, Kochi – 682 016 M/s Mayaa Impex (Age not specified years) NGGO colony post, Coimbatore – 641 022, Tamil Nadu S.H.Shahul Hameed (47 years years) No. 4A, Alandur road, Saidapet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 015 K.Sasikumar (43 years years) Riyaa Homes, 24/A, Customs Colony, VJP Chalai, Saidapet P.O, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 015 Asan Mydeen G (46 years years) 6A, Senganiamman Kovil, 1st street, Maduvinkarai, Guindy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 032

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases