Case Summary
The plaintiff, M/s. Kingdom Protection Services Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Internal Security Officer, filed a suit against M/s. Cordiant Technologies Private Limited and its directors. The court has referred the parties to arbitration and closed the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed I.A 5/24 and referred the parties to arbitration, leading to the closure of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties referred to arbitration. Suit closed vide I.A 5/24.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Kingdom Protection Services Pvt. Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s.Cordiant Technologies Private Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dennis Mathew Paul
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manju Mariam
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shaji Thankappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Subin K Sudheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vizzy George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.V Sadanandan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sruti Ravindranathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abhiram T.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kingdom Protection Services Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s.Cordiant Technologies Private Limited et al regarding arbitration.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kingdom Protection Services Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s.Cordiant Technologies Private Limited et al regarding arbitration.