Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 630/2023

Case between M/s Ketees Enterprises vs M/s Pozitive power India Pvt. Ltd. regarding non-payment of BCF

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-11-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Ketees Enterprises, represented by its proprietor Devassy K.T, filed a suit against M/s Pozitive power India Pvt. Ltd. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the plaint for non-payment.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected due to the persistent absence of the plaintiff in court. The court noted that the necessary court fees were not paid.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the persistent absence of the plaintiff in court. The court noted that the necessary court fees were not paid.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not pay the necessary court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not pay the necessary court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, not represented. Defendant represented. BCF not seen remitted so far.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected for non payment of BCF.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devassy K.T
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vistin K Varghese
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.Y.Tomy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gopika N Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akash Joshi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abel Sebastian Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunil V Mohammed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for non payment of BCF.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected for non payment of BCF.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Ketees Enterprises vs M/s Pozitive power India Pvt. Ltd. regarding non-payment of BCF
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Ketees Enterprises vs M/s Pozitive power India Pvt. Ltd. regarding non-payment of BCF

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won