Case Summary
M/s. Kaaizeen Meditech Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against Central Associates. The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to represent and pay the required court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit for non-payment of court fees. The plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff had not represented the case and had failed to pay the required fee.
The court found that the plaintiff had not represented the case and had failed to pay the required fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had not represented the case and had failed to pay the required fee.
The court found that the plaintiff had not represented the case and had failed to pay the required fee.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff had not represented the case and had failed to pay the required fee.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Kaaizeen Meditech Pvt. Ltd.
- Relation
- Rep. By its Managing Director, Sathish Warrier
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Central Associates
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- Rep. by its Proprietor Asif Rahim
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asif Rahim
- Party Age
- 43
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S. Jamal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ayyappan Sankar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S. Russel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.R Arun
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anto Thomas Palatty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vismaya Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Akshara S. Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to balance court fee not paid.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kaaizeen Meditech Pvt. Ltd. vs Central Associates regarding suit rejection due to non-payment of court fees.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kaaizeen Meditech Pvt. Ltd. vs Central Associates regarding suit rejection due to non-payment of court fees.