Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 796/2025

Case between M/s. Infra Housing Private Ltd. vs Infra Aspire Owner's Association et al regarding interim injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-11-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Infra Housing Private Ltd. filed a petition for an interim injunction against Infra Aspire Owner's Association and individuals claiming obstruction to their maintenance work in an apartment complex. The petitioner alleges that after a settlement regarding a previous ownership dispute, they were denied access to their property by the respondents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for an interim injunction filed by the plaintiffs, finding no prima facie case in their favor and determining that the balance of convenience did not support granting the injunction.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to demonstrate a valid legal ownership and right to the property, and the balance of convenience did not favor them.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no order to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Infra Housing Private Ltd. (Age not specified years) CLS Building, M.G. Road, Ernakulam, Pin-682011 Mr. George E George (62 years years) Villa No.34, Infra Meadows, CSEZ PO, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Pin-682037

Defendants

Infra Aspire Owner's Association (Age not specified years) Infra Aspire, VSNL Road, Kakkanad, Pin-682030 Gibi Varkey (47 years years) apartment No.7A, Infra Aspire, VSNL Road, Kakkanad, Pin-682030 Kavitha Panchal (40 years years) apartment No.11 C, Infra Aspire, VSNL Road, Kakkanad, Pin-682030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the respondents from causing obstruction to the petitioner and its men from carrying out maintenance work in the apartment.
Evidence:
Hence in the light of above facts and circumstances, Point nos. 1 to 4 are found against of the petitioner and it is answered accordingly.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of compromise memo dated 29/05/2025 filed before the Consumer State Commission, Kerala in appeal Nos.445/2014 and 125 of 2015.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Police Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of complaint before the Sub Inspector of Police, Thrikkakara(Infopark) Police Station with the acknowledgment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Common Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Common Judgment of the Consumer State Commission, Kerala in No.445/2014 and 124 of 2015 with appended compromise memo dated 29/05/2025.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases