Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 230/2017

Case between M/s Indus Towers Limited vs Mangalam Apartment Owners Welfare Association et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Indus Towers Limited filed a suit against Mangalam Apartment Owners Welfare Association and others. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not ready to present evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default because the plaintiff failed to present evidence despite having multiple opportunities.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default because the plaintiff failed to present evidence despite having multiple opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Indus Towers Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mangalam Apartment Owners Welfare Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Vodafone Mobile Services Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hardy George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abraham George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salim Thomas
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Sathisan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rohini S Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Agnees P.L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.R.Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not being ready for evidence.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Indus Towers Limited vs Mangalam Apartment Owners Welfare Association et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Indus Towers Limited vs Mangalam Apartment Owners Welfare Association et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won