Case Summary
The case involves M/s Indian Bank as the decree holder and Appukuttan Pillai and Radhamma as judgment debtors. The execution petition was dismissed for default due to the decree holder's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the decree holder's absence and no steps taken.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was absent and did not take any steps in the case.
The decree holder was absent and did not take any steps in the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was absent and did not take any steps in the case.
The decree holder was absent and did not take any steps in the case.
Supporting Evidence
Decree holder absent, represented. No step taken.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Indian Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Appukuttan Pillai
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Radhamma
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I.Sowfiuar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Indian Bank vs Appukuttan Pillai et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Indian Bank vs Appukuttan Pillai et al regarding execution petition