Case Summary
The plaintiff, M/s I.B.S. Software Private Limited, represented by Mr. Shabarinath, filed a suit against the defendants including Mary Ronisha M and others. The court rejected the plaint due to lack of payment of court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and failure to file a petition seeking time for payment.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to non-compliance with procedural requirements.
The plaint was rejected due to non-compliance with procedural requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to non-compliance with procedural requirements.
The plaint was rejected due to non-compliance with procedural requirements.
Supporting Evidence
No Balance Court Fee seen remitted. No petition also seen filed seeking time for payment.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 Code of civil procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s I.B.S. Software Private Limited
- Relation
- represented by its principal officer and power of attorney holder
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mary Ronisha M
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- Daughter of D. Manohar David
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- D.Manohar David
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- son of late R David
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S. Leo
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o P Soosai Viagulam
Plaintiffs Documents
None mentioned
Defendants Documents
None mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Nair Ajay Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vishnu S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vishnu Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vaisakh Subodham
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee seen remitted. No petition also seen filed seeking time for payment. Hence the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 Code of civil procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s I.B.S. Software Private Limited vs Mary Ronisha M et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between M/s I.B.S. Software Private Limited vs Mary Ronisha M et al regarding rejection of plaint