Case Summary
M/s HRJ refrigeration Private Ltd filed a suit against M/s. Tele Tech Engineers & Contractors to recover outstanding payments for materials supplied. The defendant failed to honor invoices despite initial timely payments, leading to a claim of Rs.2,10,665.68.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.2,10,665.68 with interest at 12% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting the claimed amount along with reduced interest. The defendant was found liable for failing to pay for the materials supplied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted oral testimony and exhibits established the plaintiff's case.
The unrebutted oral testimony and exhibits established the plaintiff's case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted oral testimony and exhibits established the plaintiff's case.
The unrebutted oral testimony and exhibits established the plaintiff's case.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A12, A14 and A15 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,10,665.68/- (Rupees Two Lakh Ten Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty Five and Sixty Eight Paise only) from the defendant and from their assets.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s HRJ refrigeration Private Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Tele Tech Engineers & Contractors
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoices A1 to A15, lawyer's notice
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Susanth Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sidharth O.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Albin A. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nekha Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Parvathy T.M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs.2,10,665.68 from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,10,665.68/- (Rupees Two Lakh Ten Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty Five and Sixty Eight Paise only) from the defendant and from their assets.
Relief Type:
Interest
Outcome:
Partly Granted
Description:
Interest on the amount due at varying rates.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.2,10,665.68/-... The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.2,10,665.68/- from date of decree till date of realization.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Recovery of costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from their assets.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoices for materials supplied by the plaintiff, which were not paid by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A15
Document Type:
Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
A legal notice sent to the defendant to settle the dues as per the invoices.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type:
Ledger Account
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Records of transactions and outstanding amounts related to the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type:
Board Resolution
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document confirming the authority of the plaintiff's representative in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Oral testimony of the plaintiff establishing the claims made.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s HRJ refrigeration Private Ltd vs M/s. Tele Tech Engineers & Contractors regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s HRJ refrigeration Private Ltd vs M/s. Tele Tech Engineers & Contractors regarding realization of money