Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1189/2018

Case between M/s. Horizon Cheryl Enclave Apartment Owners Association vs P.T. Joseph et al regarding failure to provide water supply connection

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-17
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/17/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is an apartment owners association suing the defendants, who are builders and developers, for failing to provide a water supply connection to the apartment complex after collecting payments for it. The plaintiff association alleges that due to the defendants' negligence, the residents suffered financial losses and mental agony.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff association failed to prove that the defendants had a contractual obligation to provide the water connection, leading to the dismissal of the suit. The court held that since there was no privity of contract between the plaintiff and the defendants, the claims for damages were not valid.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff association failed to prove that the defendants had a contractual obligation to provide the water connection, leading to the dismissal of the suit. The court held that since there was no privity of contract between the plaintiff and the defendants, the claims for damages were not valid.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to establish privity of contract between themselves and the defendants.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to establish privity of contract between themselves and the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
In the absence of such proof, none of the defendants can be held liable for the amount incurred by the plaintiff association to have brought in potable drinking water to the flat in question.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed and the parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Horizon Cheryl Enclave Apartment Owners Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.T. Joseph
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Holy Faith Builders and Developers Private Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Horizon Ventures Private Limited
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Certificate of Registration, Certified true copy of the Bye-laws, Certified extract of the minutes of the General Body of Plaintiff Association, Agreement for Sale, Agreement of Construction, Original bills (55 Nos), Office copy of the lawyer notice, Reply of lawyer notice, Bill issued by Kerala Water Authority
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of the Writ Petition W.P (c) No. 15388/2017 with Exhibits, Certified copy of the Judgment in WP(C) No: 15388/2017

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.S Kalkura
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Harish Gopinath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Njumal Hussain
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Athira C.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Philip T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nisha George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joan Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Subha Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Compensation for damages claimed by the Plaintiff Association due to defendants' failure to provide water supply.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has failed to prove that the defendants had failed to provide Kerala water authority connection to the above mentioned flat, after entering into any agreement to provide for the same.
Relief Type: Compensatory Costs
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Defendant's claim for compensatory costs for the suit being vexatious.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances that surround the case, I am of the opinion that the power under section 35A of the CPC need not be invoked in the case at hand.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certificate of Registration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of the Plaintiff Association's registration under the relevant Act.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Bye-Laws
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details of the governing rules of the Plaintiff Association.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Minutes of the General Body Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Official record of decisions made by the Plaintiff Association.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement for sale
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document relevant to the sale agreement between the Defendants and members of the Plaintiff Association, marked subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement of Construction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document relevant to the construction agreement, marked subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Bills
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of expenses incurred by the Plaintiff for water supplied via tankers.
Reference:
Ext.A6 (series)
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to Defendants requesting water connection.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Reply of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendants' response to the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Bill from Kerala Water Authority
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of billing related to water services.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Certified Copy of the Writ Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supporting document from Defendant regarding past legal proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Judgment from the past Writ Petition relevant to the current proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Failure to provide water supply connection
Case Code
Case between M/s. Horizon Cheryl Enclave Apartment Owners Association vs P.T. Joseph et al regarding failure to provide water supply connection
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Horizon Cheryl Enclave Apartment Owners Association vs P.T. Joseph et al regarding failure to provide water supply connection

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 07/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/17/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Apartment Owners Association

Similar Cases

Case between Abhilash Joy et al vs Skyline Aster & Lavender Apartment Owners Association et al regarding election conduct and management issues.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between B.Venugopal vs D.D.Golden Gate Apartment Owners Association et al regarding financial loss and demand for dues
THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Heera Life Style Apartment Owners Association vs Syamala Shenoy regarding recovery of maintenance charges.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between MH-10A- Mystic Heights 1 Apartment Owners Association vs Shwas Homes Private Limited et al regarding maintenance of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Blue Chip Apartment Owners Association vs Dr. Roshini Abraham regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won